BRS Legislature Party deputy leader T Harish Rao has challenged Telangana Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy to order an independent inquiry by a sitting Supreme Court judge into alleged irregularities involving Section 22-A prohibited lands. Speaking in Hyderabad on Wednesday, September 16, 2026, Rao demanded that the probe cover land transactions processed through both the state’s previous and current digital land platforms. The political escalation follows statements made by the chief minister in the Telangana Assembly regarding substantial land holdings allegedly linked to former chief minister K Chandrasekhar Rao and his family members.
| Detail | Info |
|---|---|
| Probe sought by Harish Rao | Sitting Supreme Court judge |
| White paper coverage date | From December 7, 2023 |
| Registrations alleged by Rao | 9,200 |
| Deadline for Erravalli report | 30 days |
| Erravalli Survey No. 1944 size | 2,447 acres |
| Alleged govt land in Survey No. 325 | 388 acres |
| Alleged KCR family land | 439.30 acres |
Harish Rao Demands Supreme Court Judge Inquiry
In response to Assembly accusations, Harish Rao asserted that any investigation must be completely independent of state officials to ensure transparency. He demanded a thorough examination of land transactions executed under the previous BRS government’s Dharani system as well as the current Congress government’s system via the Bhu Bharati Portal.
Rao also called for the immediate release of a white paper detailing all properties added to and removed from the state’s Section 22-A prohibited list since December 7, 2023. As part of his political counter-attack, he alleged that 9,200 property registrations had been completed under the new portal without the knowledge of the actual owners.
The former minister defended his party colleagues by stating that BRS leaders had fully disclosed their assets in their election affidavits. He accused the chief minister of dodging direct questions regarding the ongoing administration of prohibited land lists.
Title Uncertainty for Property Buyers and Investors
The intensifying dispute has immediate implications for landowners, heirs, buyers, and real estate developers across Telangana. Properties that appear on or are removed from the Section 22-A prohibited list face heavy scrutiny, and any registration or transfer of such properties can be significantly delayed or tied up in legal disputes.
People whose ownership or transaction history is recorded in either of the state’s official digital systems may also face complications if a broad judicial inquiry is ordered. The uncertainty surrounding title validity, competing government land claims, and pending registrations creates an unpredictable environment for banks processing home loans, real estate investors, and prospective purchasers.
Metro Real Estate Market Watches Assembly Row Closely
While the dispute is politically centered in Hyderabad where the Assembly debates took place, its shockwaves affect the wider Hyderabad metropolitan land market. The allegations directly concern prohibited properties, government land, and portal-based transactions in Telangana districts adjoining the capital.
Because the real estate ecosystem in these connected districts relies heavily on clear titles and undisputed government boundaries, any mass alterations to the prohibited-properties list or mass invalidation of registrations could stall upcoming residential and commercial projects.
“The government should order an independent inquiry by a sitting Supreme Court judge into land transactions under both Dharani and Bhu Bharati, completely independent of state officials.”
Revanth Reddy Orders Erravalli Farmhouse Encroachment Report
The current row ignited when Chief Minister Revanth Reddy alleged in the Assembly that KCR and his family held 439.30 acres of land spread across nine districts, 24 mandals, and 31 villages. These figures were immediately disputed by BRS leaders.
Specifically, the chief minister pointed to Survey No. 1944 in Erravalli, which spans 2,447 acres, noting that about 295 acres remain disputed between Erravalli and Shivar Venkatapuram. He further alleged that 388 acres of government land under Survey No. 325 were absorbed into a farmhouse area.
Following these statements, Revanth Reddy directed Revenue officials to issue formal notices to K Chandrasekhar Rao to determine the exact proportion of purchased land versus alleged government land within the Erravalli farmhouse perimeter.
Revenue Department Awaits 30-Day Fact-Finding Deadline
The immediate next step in this dispute rests with the Telangana Revenue department, which is working against a 30-day deadline ordered by the chief minister. Officials are expected to serve notices and submit their formal findings regarding the Erravalli site.
Simultaneously, a designated fact-finding committee will visit the site to conduct a physical survey and identify any unauthorized occupants of government land. Meanwhile, Harish Rao’s demands for a Supreme Court judge-led inquiry and the publication of a Section 22-A white paper remain pending political requests rather than confirmed government policies.
Reality Check
Readers and property investors should treat the figures cited in this political dispute—including the 9,200 unauthorized registrations alleged by Harish Rao and the 439.30 acres attributed to the KCR family by the chief minister—as unverified political claims. None of these allegations have been established by an independent judicial inquiry. Until official records, transaction histories, and legal notices are made public, these numbers do not constitute actionable government findings.
Analysis
An independent judicial inquiry would be necessary to separate verified title records from competing political narratives. For real estate stakeholders, the proposed white paper identifying survey numbers, dates, and reasons for Section 22-A additions or removals is the most crucial demand. Without transparency on which properties have been restricted or released, buyers and lenders face elevated risks when assessing property titles in the state.
Frequently Asked Questions
What probe has Harish Rao demanded?
He has sought an inquiry by a sitting Supreme Court judge into Section 22-A land issues and alleged irregularities in both Dharani and Bhu Bharati transactions.
What is the requested white paper supposed to cover?
Rao wants details from December 7, 2023, onward, specifically identifying the properties and land parcels added to or removed from the Section 22-A prohibited list.
What did Revanth Reddy order regarding KCR’s farmhouse?
He directed Revenue officials to issue legal notices, assess the extent of government land allegedly enclosed within the Erravalli farmhouse, and submit a comprehensive report within 30 days.
Is the alleged figure of 9,200 unauthorized registrations confirmed?
No. The figure was a political allegation raised by Harish Rao and has not been independently confirmed by any government or judicial report.
Which land-record systems are involved in this dispute?
The controversy spans two digital systems: Dharani, which was used extensively during the previous BRS administration, and Bhu Bharati, the current portal referred to by Rao in connection with the Congress government.
Has a Supreme Court judge-led inquiry actually been ordered?
No such order has been passed. The judicial probe and the white paper are currently political demands made by the opposition.
Stay Ahead on Hyderabad Real Estate
Get daily property news, price trends and verified listings.
Follow us on WhatsApp or download the BigProperty App for instant alerts.
